Archive for July, 2006

Is the search for a credible candidate over?

Monday, July 31st, 2006

After reading in the Times over the weekend about the Tories’ candidate for Mayor of London (or in this case the lack of one)…I was beginning to look foward to seeing poor Steve Norris get trampled for the third time. But it looks like we may all be saved from that embarrassment..

It seems that the Tories were trying to find anyone that was “credible” - in this case, credibility was defined as a) having been on TV and b) having annoyed vast swaths of the public. Extras points were awarded for having annoyed vasts swaths of the electorate on TV - Jeremy Clarkson was the front runner in this category. Candidates also included Former Ambassador Chris Meyer (but clearly he got turned down because everyone would get confused by Mayor Meyer!).

According to Guido (who, of course, predicted it weeks ago) Nick Boles is going to run (probably) on the populist platform to bring back the Routemaster buses.

Although I like the bendy buses - I have to admit that Red Ken made a mistake with these ones. If I remember correctly (although I can’t find the article I read it in) London bought the cheaper model without the fire suppression units installed.

Well there’s certainly a vast number of Londoners who would like to see all the bendy buses go up in flames (athough without anyone on them - I hope).

Solar panels coming to a high street near you

Monday, July 31st, 2006

Apparently Currys are planning to start selling solar panels at 3 of their high street stores (Croydon, Fulham and West Thurrock). The panels will sell for around £1000 each with approximately 9 required to provide 50% of a 3-bedroom house’s electricity needs. By my reckoning that means it’ll take 50 years for a 9 panel installation to pay for itself based on an electricity bill of £350/year. Having said that, there are grants available for microgeneration at the moment and in the current climate energy bills are only likely to go up.

All in all this can only be a good thing but adopters are going to remain concerned environmentalists unless the financials become more favourable.

Via The Register.

PM continues to lecture

Tuesday, July 25th, 2006

It looks like our dear Prime Minister is going to lecture us on public health tomorrow. Well with the NHS falling into bankruptcy and staff being laid off he’s got to make some savings somewhere. It’s just a shame that’ll we all just ignore any advice he decides to give us.

I’d rather hug a hoodie than give up my couch potato lifestyle.

It’s interesting that they’re spinning them as lectures now…its more than a speech, less than a policy announcement…one presumes. Or is this just Blair practicising for when he leaves office and joins the lecture circuit!

When will the “undesirables” arrive?

Monday, July 24th, 2006

Thanks to the Sunday Times we now know a bit more about the Government’s views on the accession of Bulgaria and Romania into the EU. Interestingly enough those views are: We’re stuffed! Let’s panic!

It seems that the Government’s worried that “undesirables” will enter the UK. So they’ve come up with a list of those who arent welcome- all 45,000 of them. I’m not sure what they’ll do with this list as they’ve already admitted they can’t do anything about them coming here (mostly because of a mixture of EU laws- the freedom of movement directive is a good starting place for more information). But at least if they have a list they might know which “undesirables” have entered the country. Although when it comes to tracing people, needles and haystacks aways come to mind.

I’ve already mentioned my support for enlargement of the EU and I standby that view. And i’m still not convinced by the argument that hundreds of thousands of Romanians and Bulgarians will pack up their belongings and head to the UK on the 1st January. For one thing its cold here, and most of their cousins live in warmer climates.

Thanks to the leaked documents we know what the Government’s estimates are on immigration. IPPR said 56,000. Migrant watch said 300,000 (in the first 20 months). The Government?

Right bang in the middle with - 60,000-140,000.

Maybe we should have a bet to see who’s the closest. My moneys on 70k.

Rant: Council tax

Sunday, July 23rd, 2006

Okay, every year I get some kind of problem with the council tax. Last year they lost hundreds of pounds, this year it’s random requests for small amounts of money that we don’t owe them. Frankly I’m sick of it. Solution: scrap local council tax collection. Replace it with additional address linked income tax administered through the existing national system.
Benefits:

  • Fewer (inept local council) tax collectors which has got be more efficient.
  • Low income households and pensioners pay less.
  • Encourages high income businesses to move to areas of lower income tax which could be used to redress the North-South divide.
  • I’m a lot happier (this is in reverse order of importance obviously).

Obviously there are going to be unfairnesses with this system but the current regime isn’t exactly Robin Hood. Vive la Révolution!

Destroy the euromyth

Thursday, July 20th, 2006

There’s a great post over on David Rennie’s blog today where he gives an insight into how euromyths are developed.  Rennie traces a story on bombay mix - apparently the EU Commission has plans to change the name to Mumbai mix- from a contact at the home office (probably overheard in the local pub) to a full blown story in the Sun. The journalist who wrote it (well got another reporter to write it for him) pretty much admits making it up.
EU Referendum destroyed a similar story with their usual finesse on minced meat products a few weeks ago.

It worries me that such stories are not challenge more often..and they certainly need to be. Half the people that read the story will approach it appropriately with cynicism, the other half will always believe everything they read.  This rarely helps in adding anything to the debate over the future of the EU.

In solidarity to our blogging comrades

Saturday, July 15th, 2006

Disgraceful behaviour by John McDonnell MP who has tried to stop a parliamentary assistant publishing this story on his blog.

“Interesting message on John McDonnell MP’s Westminster office answerphone at the moment, which goes something like this:

“You are through to John McDonnell’s office, this is a very busy office, so in the interests of serving our constituents this office is closed for business on Wednesdays, and we only accept messages between 10am to 1pm Monday to Thursday.”

Obviously that’s messages between 10am to 1pm Monday to Thursday, except for Wednesdays, I presume. So from this I take it that John McDonnell’s office is open 3 hours a day, 3 days a week. I bet he is grateful for that 10,847 majority. He may need it.”

In solidarity for our fellow blogging comrades i’ve blogged this story.  Please do the same.  Hell hath no furry like a blogger scorned…McDonnell should remember that trying to hide the story creates more interest.  Now it’ll be read by thousands.

Latest PR from McD

Saturday, July 15th, 2006

Mc D’s have started a new PR campaign to convince us that their burgers only contain meat and that they care about the environment. It’s all on a swanky new website called- Make up your own mind.

As expected the questions put on the website, supposedly supplied by real people, are not answered at all. For example, someone asks “can you do more reduce your packaging?”

The answer: “we aim to make sure that as much of our packaging as possible is made from renewable resources”. No mention of any attempt to reduce packaging. And they certainly need to make an effect to reduce it - see my post on packaging.

They’ve even started offering to take people to see the cows that Mc D’s meat comes from and become a Quality Scout. I wonder if that includes a trip around the production factories…my guess is probably not!

Review - Anthony & Cleopatra 11th July, The Globe, London

Thursday, July 13th, 2006

We never see the early meetings of Mark Anthony & Cleopatra, nor really hear of the time following as their romance flowers. We join the action at its peak and are witness only to its denouement. Ultimately, the play is a story of decline.

Two declines, in fact. The decline of a republic - Rome, as it becomes imperial under Octavius - and the second triumvirate and of the central relationship. Good! In the cycles of history, eras of decay are always far more interesting than those of construction.

Like any breakdown, the play is complex, fragmented, precisely unpredictable yet frustratingly inevitable. In short, a play about love as it is, a play for grown ups. (Which is not to say, given the choice, one would choose it over the more immediately satisfying idealism of the jail-bait duo in Romeo & Juliet.)

Of course, we know this even before the characters do. There is no narrative tension in A&C - we all know how it will end. We know Mark Anthony is a broken man as soon as we see him. Only he needs to wait until Actium to realise. We know Cleopatra will commit suicide, we know Octavius will seize power, we know Pompey will try to avenge his ill-remembered father, and many in the audience even know every line of verse along the way. The tension comes from elsewhere.

It is inherent in the precarious balance of head and heart for which the characters struggle, and I doubt I am sticking my neck out when I say particularly Cleopatra. And it is here that the Globe production fails, missing the point of the masterpiece.

Writing like this is not a gobbed-out catharsis, it is the exact opposite - it is control.

A novice play-watcher, I do not know if this is an error of actor or director or both, but error it decidedly is. There must be a hundred ways to play Cleopatra, most of them valid, but surely to play her in a perpetual tantrum, as Frances Barber does, is to lose much. It flattens her character. By being always angry, she never is. Whether or not Barber has sufficient self-regard, stage-presence or even the voice to pull off such an effort - which per haps she does not - is not the point. Even if she had succeeded in seeming truly, frighteningly angry, to do so all the time would be to waste the shock that would come with a more sparing deployment. Ultimately, like Pirelli tyres, power is nothing without control.

Another problem with this approach is that putting all her acting eggs into one basket of terminal crossness, when it doesn’t come off, when she goes for power but finds it lacking, her performance at times touches on camp. Frustratingly Barber seems to have settled for getting the laughs when she could be rooting us to the spot. Fine - laughter can be hard to achieve and she does it well. But, though I might know fuck all about putting on a play, I can read - there are so many gimmes in the script that she could have played a colder, calculating, and yes a more interesting Cleopatra and still had the audience in fits. In fact, like the anger, the sparing use of comedy would have made it funnier.

It is sad in a way because at times she shows glimpses of what she can do. Though she gets most applause for her slapstick beating of a messenger and most (male) attention for her feline physicality, the moments of her (so she imagines) raw abandonment with her women at the front of the stage are real highlights. Nevertheless one is still left ruing a missed opportunity. We should watch Cleopatra in a three-hour balancing act, traversing the deep abyss of her raw psyche. Here she may as well be traversing a paddling-pool.

This article concentrates on Cleopatra because she is the star of this show, and not just because she is the star of the script. But Anthony is played adequately, though with less charisma than the role should surely demand. Nicholas Jones plays him more like a befuddled middle-level manager than a “third pillar of the world”. The lack of electricity between the main characters is palpable, though this need not be a total disaster. After all, the regular hyperbolic outpourings of love required by the script certainly lead one to think that this relationship, like most, is little more than a mutual ego-massage - which is not to lessen its necessity or import, we all need it (increasingly!). The embarrassing divorced-dad style kissing would, in this case, work well, as the sort of understandable middle-aged desperation that curls the toes of reluctant onlookers.

I am tired now and want to go to bed, so let us dash through the rest.

And, I am sorry to say, for the rest, nothing less than crucifixion will do. Nail up the producer! Nail him up and burn the poor man’s threadbare, flea-infested, shit-stained casting couch. Enobarbus is a part which, from reading the script at least, might just be the most interesting male character. But not here, nowhere near - undervalued and quiet without being considered. But Enobarabus is as a soft fruit and champagne success compared to the stale Hofmeister and Monster Munch disgrace of the other male leads. Mecenas even made me angry, such was his non-performance. Was the man actually an actor or merely one of the GCSE students enjoying the show and slouching against the stage (and trying to look up Cleopatra’s skirt - no point, lads, trust me)? I don’t know his name but luckily for the lead soldier - i.e. the soldier!!- he was in no danger of having a beer can flung at him, for I was too busy laughing into it. O, rest you easy, my freedom-loving Britons, for thine mighty enemy is being lead apparently by the most insipid slinky-hipped mincer in the entire legion. The man was too busy trying to look mean and glowering while waving his wandy little wrist around to actually scare anyone. And as for Octavius, the soon to be emperor Augustus Caeser, the man who would rule the world, alone and on-high, for the next several decades. Well, yes, he was (quite) young in real life, but surely he didn’t need to look quite so much like the leader of the crappest gang at school. You know the sort: you could expect to see him on the school bus being picked on by boys in the year below. The only followers he had would stay out of the way and pretend to pick leaves out of bushes while the Year 7s kicked the shit out of him. Someone tell the actor that if you play a boy who will be king, you cannot forget the ‘king’ part. Weed!

So, disappointing, but not without merit (though almost entirely hers).

The Vox Polis Globetastic rating for Anthony & Cleopatra is thus: nice tits, but no cigar!

Results in from the energy review

Tuesday, July 11th, 2006

The government are due to announce this afternoon that new nuclear power plants will be required to meet the UK’s energy needs into the future without increasing our reliance on foreign supplies of fossil fuels.  There’s considerable opposition to this from environmental groups, the Liberal Democrats and some Labour MPs but the cabinet are (publically at least) behind nuclear and there’s enough time before the next election for them to set us on the road.  There will also be funds for renewable schemes but it seems unlikely that the government will aim for more than 20% of energy supply from renewables.

My key problem with this is the way the decision appears to have been taken.  At no point during the review process has it seemed likely that the result would favour anything over than more nuclear generation.  Indeed, Tony Blair was publicly backing nuclear power as far back as May.  The decision to place increased reliance on nuclear power will have ramifications for generations to come both in terms of waste disposal and the inevitable setbacks to progress on generation from renewable sources.  In light of these long term consequences I’m, frankly, horrified at the shadowy way the review has been conducted without extensive public debate and at our prime minister’s attitude that he didn’t even need a review to make his mind up.  In a political climate of short-termism and knee jerk policy making how can we trust the government with the nation’s long term security?