<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good signs from the Gowers Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.voxpolis.com/2006/good-signs-from-the-gowers-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.voxpolis.com/2006/good-signs-from-the-gowers-review/</link>
	<description>Politics, culture, surrealism...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vox Polis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Greedy musicians sign advert</title>
		<link>http://www.voxpolis.com/2006/good-signs-from-the-gowers-review/#comment-1346</link>
		<dc:creator>Vox Polis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Greedy musicians sign advert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voxpolis.com/2006/good-signs-from-the-gowers-review/#comment-1346</guid>
		<description>[...] You&#8217;re sick of reading about it and I&#8217;m sick of writing about it but copyright extension just won&#8217;t go away. After the Gower&#8217;s review recommended no extension to the copyright term for sound recordings I really thought we&#8217;d seen the back of this. Apparently not. This morning I read that 4500 musicians including Sir Cliff Richard and Katie Melua (now there&#8217;s a soporific duet) have signed an advert in the Financial Times calling again for an extension of copyright on sound recordings to 95 years. Is it just me or is this all getting a bit demeaning? My advice to the signatories of this advert: stop this pathetic grubbing around to wring out every last penny from your faded glories. If you want to make more money record some new songs, go on a tour, work as a musician. If that doesn&#8217;t work then do what the rest of us do and get a normal job. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You&#8217;re sick of reading about it and I&#8217;m sick of writing about it but copyright extension just won&#8217;t go away. After the Gower&#8217;s review recommended no extension to the copyright term for sound recordings I really thought we&#8217;d seen the back of this. Apparently not. This morning I read that 4500 musicians including Sir Cliff Richard and Katie Melua (now there&#8217;s a soporific duet) have signed an advert in the Financial Times calling again for an extension of copyright on sound recordings to 95 years. Is it just me or is this all getting a bit demeaning? My advice to the signatories of this advert: stop this pathetic grubbing around to wring out every last penny from your faded glories. If you want to make more money record some new songs, go on a tour, work as a musician. If that doesn&#8217;t work then do what the rest of us do and get a normal job. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
