In a ruling yesterday a judge found the government’s energy review “misleading”, “seriously flawed” and “procedurally unfair”. The challenge to the consultation was made by Greenpeace. I raised my own concerns about the government’s conduct of the review last July.
In response to the ruling Greenpeace called for the government to “go back to the drawing board”. Tony Blair said the judge’s findings would have no effect on policy.
Given the strong language of the ruling it seems likely that the government will have to, at least, make a token effort at a second consultation but I doubt this will change anything. Energy policy has already been decided at the highest levels of government and given the top-down nature of the current administration it’s hard to imagine and amount of consultation leading to a change of course.
Time is running out to replace our aging and unsecure power supplies and nuclear energy, for all its faults, has the advantage of being ready to go immediately. What’s really needed, instead of crowing by Greenpeace and the opposition parties, is for someone to present a coherent, accurately costed alternative to the nuclear route as soon as possible.