Well it seems that the dreaded EU Constitution beast is to raise its head and roar once again. If you’ve been following the debate recently then you may have noticed that Jose Barroso, in his “communication to the EU Summit,” aka the “Citizens’ Agenda” has basically outlined a time table for the return of the EU Constitution. The plan is to concentrate on action to begin with - convince everyone that the EU is working by achieving a few projects together..such as more co-operation on home and justice issues (also known as getting rid of member states’ vetoes) and issuing a benefit card to all citizens so they know what the benefit of the EU is (what the hell is the cost of that one going to be?).
Then, next year, during the German Presidency of the EU, after the French and the Dutch have a new government thats more popular and more able to get a referendum passed, and over half the states have ratified the EU constitution, it’ll be brought back with the usual fanfare (this time a symbollic declaration to coincide with the 50th anniversary of the Messina declaration) with only minor changes for the remaining states to pass any way they can.
If you don’t believe me, then read the speech that Angelica Schwall-Düren, the Deputy head of the SPD in the Bundestag, gave at the IPPR yesterday. She outlined what changes the Germans are going to make during their Presidency to help bring it back.
Personally I think that the UK got a good deal with the EU Constitution, and the framework it outlines would work a hell of a lot better than what we’ve got now. But it seems i’m not on the side of the majority.
Speaking on the other side of the debate at the IPPR was Denis MacShane, the ex-Europe Minister, who decided to declare that what all the leaders of Europe are really thinking, and saying in private, is that the Constitution is dead, but they won’t admit it publically. I think that’s proabably quite true. What I really think is happening, is the buraeaucracy (i.e. EU Commission) are the one’s that are really pushing for it. The EU Leaders are just trying to show they’re not completely incompetent by suggesting some minor alterations (cherrypicking, ‘grand projets’ etc etc).
If you follow the above link to Denis’ speech you come out at David Rennie’s blog (who’s pretty good at following what’s going on in the EU, even if his paper - the Daily Telegraph- doesn’t always appreciate it). He argues that Denis’ speech is the best idea we’re going to get of what Blair and the government are thinking. Although there’s some truth to this (the government would definately like the issue to disappear, especially if they have to have a referendum) I think Blair will sign up to anything that the other EU states agree. But also don’t foget that Denis was at odds with Blair over the referendum (read his speech for the highlights) he could be expressing a different opinion now.